LED face masks · head to head
Two of the nine LED face masks in our comparison table, side by side. Every figure below is one the manufacturer publishes itself; where a brand stays silent the cell says so.
The short answer
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 emits at 463 nm, 592 nm, 633 nm. The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) covers both red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin; the Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 does not.
Neither brand publishes an irradiance figure, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared from the specification sheets.
Σύγκριση προδιαγραφών
| Specification | Shark CryoGlow (FW312) | Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 |
|---|---|---|
| Μήκη κύματος | 415 nm630 nm830 nm | 463 nm592 nm633 nm |
| LED | 160+ (multizona) | 100 |
| Ακτινοβολία | No publicada | No publicada |
| Δόση | — | — |
| Συνεδρία | 8 min | ~10 min |
| Λειτουργίες | 3 programas específicos + enfriamiento para el contorno de ojos | 4 colores |
| Κανονιστική κατάσταση | Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE/UKCA | Dispositivo cosmético con marcado CE — sin autorización de la FDA para este modelo |
| Εφαρμογή | Rígida, multizona | Semirrígida |
| Ισχύς | Con cable USB-C (el enfriamiento necesita alimentación) | Recargable, ~130 min de autonomía |
| Τιμή | 379,99 € | 160,00 € |
“Published irradiance” means the brand prints an output figure on its own product page. “FDA cleared” is not “FDA approved” — see the questions below.
Where they differ
Σημειώσεις
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) uses 160+ (multizona) LEDs at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 8 min.
Dos estudios de 12 semanas realizados por la marca y divulgados públicamente — más datos publicados que la mayoría de sus rivales aquí. El enfriamiento del contorno de ojos es una función de confort, no un mecanismo lumínico.
The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 uses 100 LEDs at 463 nm, 592 nm, 633 nm, in sessions of ~10 min.
Un dispositivo cosmético, no un producto médico certificado. Sus 463 nm y 592 nm cuentan con menos respaldo de evidencia que el rojo y el infrarrojo cercano principales.
Συχνές ερωτήσεις
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 emits at 463 nm, 592 nm, 633 nm. The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) covers both red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin; the Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 does not.
Neither brand publishes an irradiance figure, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared from the specification sheets.
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) carries more diodes: 160 against 100. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.
Shark CryoGlow (FW312): Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE/UKCA. Silk’n LED Face Mask 100: Dispositivo cosmético con marcado CE — sin autorización de la FDA para este modelo. Clearance under section 510(k) means the manufacturer showed substantial equivalence to a device already on the market and met safety standards — it is not FDA approval, and it is not evidence of efficacy.
Keep comparing