LED face masks · head to head
Two of the nine LED face masks in our comparison table, side by side. Every figure below is one the manufacturer publishes itself; where a brand stays silent the cell says so.
The short answer
The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 emits at 463 nm, 592 nm, 633 nm. The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo emits at 415 nm, 633 nm, 830 nm. The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo covers both red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin; the Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 does not.
Neither brand publishes an irradiance figure, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared from the specification sheets.
Σύγκριση προδιαγραφών
| Specification | Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 | Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo |
|---|---|---|
| Μήκη κύματος | 463 nm592 nm633 nm | 415 nm633 nm830 nm |
| LED | 100 | 504 |
| Ακτινοβολία | No publicada | No publicada |
| Δόση | — | — |
| Συνεδρία | ~10 min | 12 min |
| Λειτουργίες | 4 colores | 3 longitudes de onda + vibración |
| Κανονιστική κατάσταση | Dispositivo cosmético con marcado CE — sin autorización de la FDA para este modelo | Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE |
| Εφαρμογή | Semirrígida | Semirrígida, sin cable |
| Ισχύς | Recargable, ~130 min de autonomía | Recargable, sin cable |
| Τιμή | 160,00 € | 349,00 € |
“Published irradiance” means the brand prints an output figure on its own product page. “FDA cleared” is not “FDA approved” — see the questions below.
Where they differ
Σημειώσεις
The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 uses 100 LEDs at 463 nm, 592 nm, 633 nm, in sessions of ~10 min.
Un dispositivo cosmético, no un producto médico certificado. Sus 463 nm y 592 nm cuentan con menos respaldo de evidencia que el rojo y el infrarrojo cercano principales.
The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo uses 504 LEDs at 415 nm, 633 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 12 min.
Cita un estudio con 104 participantes, el mayor que la marca reivindica en esta categoría — realizado por la propia marca. La vibración es un extra de confort, no un mecanismo cutáneo.
Συχνές ερωτήσεις
The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 emits at 463 nm, 592 nm, 633 nm. The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo emits at 415 nm, 633 nm, 830 nm. The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo covers both red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin; the Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 does not.
Neither brand publishes an irradiance figure, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared from the specification sheets.
The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo carries more diodes: 504 against 100. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.
Silk’n LED Face Mask 100: Dispositivo cosmético con marcado CE — sin autorización de la FDA para este modelo. Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo: Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE. Clearance under section 510(k) means the manufacturer showed substantial equivalence to a device already on the market and met safety standards — it is not FDA approval, and it is not evidence of efficacy.
Keep comparing