LED face masks · head to head
Two of the nine LED face masks in our comparison table, side by side. Every figure below is one the manufacturer publishes itself; where a brand stays silent the cell says so.
The short answer
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo emits at 415 nm, 633 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.
Neither brand publishes an irradiance figure, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared from the specification sheets.
Σύγκριση προδιαγραφών
| Specification | Shark CryoGlow (FW312) | Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo |
|---|---|---|
| Μήκη κύματος | 415 nm630 nm830 nm | 415 nm633 nm830 nm |
| LED | 160+ (multizona) | 504 |
| Ακτινοβολία | No publicada | No publicada |
| Δόση | — | — |
| Συνεδρία | 8 min | 12 min |
| Λειτουργίες | 3 programas específicos + enfriamiento para el contorno de ojos | 3 longitudes de onda + vibración |
| Κανονιστική κατάσταση | Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE/UKCA | Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE |
| Εφαρμογή | Rígida, multizona | Semirrígida, sin cable |
| Ισχύς | Con cable USB-C (el enfriamiento necesita alimentación) | Recargable, sin cable |
| Τιμή | 379,99 € | 349,00 € |
“Published irradiance” means the brand prints an output figure on its own product page. “FDA cleared” is not “FDA approved” — see the questions below.
Where they differ
Σημειώσεις
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) uses 160+ (multizona) LEDs at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 8 min.
Dos estudios de 12 semanas realizados por la marca y divulgados públicamente — más datos publicados que la mayoría de sus rivales aquí. El enfriamiento del contorno de ojos es una función de confort, no un mecanismo lumínico.
The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo uses 504 LEDs at 415 nm, 633 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 12 min.
Cita un estudio con 104 participantes, el mayor que la marca reivindica en esta categoría — realizado por la propia marca. La vibración es un extra de confort, no un mecanismo cutáneo.
Συχνές ερωτήσεις
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo emits at 415 nm, 633 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.
Neither brand publishes an irradiance figure, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared from the specification sheets.
The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo carries more diodes: 504 against 160. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.
Shark CryoGlow (FW312): Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE/UKCA. Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo: Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE. Clearance under section 510(k) means the manufacturer showed substantial equivalence to a device already on the market and met safety standards — it is not FDA approval, and it is not evidence of efficacy.
Keep comparing