LED face masks · head to head

Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced vs
Shark CryoGlow (FW312)

Two of the nine LED face masks in our comparison table, side by side. Every figure below is one the manufacturer publishes itself; where a brand stays silent the cell says so.

The short answer

The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced emits at 465 nm, 530 nm, 630–660 nm, 850 nm. The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.

Only the Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced publishes an irradiance figure (26,9–50,0 mW/cm² por modo · rojo/NIR 38,4–42,6). The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) does not, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared.

Σύγκριση προδιαγραφών

The specifications

Manufacturer-published specifications, checked 2026.
Specification Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced Shark CryoGlow (FW312)
Μήκη κύματος465 nm530 nm630–660 nm850 nm415 nm630 nm830 nm
LED280160+ (multizona)
Ακτινοβολία26,9–50,0 mW/cm² por modo · rojo/NIR 38,4–42,6No publicada
Δόσηup to 30 J/cm²
Συνεδρία~10 min8 min
Λειτουργίες9 modos seleccionables3 programas específicos + enfriamiento para el contorno de ojos
Κανονιστική κατάστασηAutorización de la FDA (510(k)) K253712, Clase II · CE · ISO 13485 · IEC 60601 · IEC 62471Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE/UKCA
ΕφαρμογήSilicona flexible, 300 gRígida, multizona
ΙσχύςRecargable, 2000 mAh, USB-CCon cable USB-C (el enfriamiento necesita alimentación)
Τιμή279,00 €379,99 €

“Published irradiance” means the brand prints an output figure on its own product page. “FDA cleared” is not “FDA approved” — see the questions below.

Where they differ

Wavelengths
The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced emits at 465 nm, 530 nm, 630–660 nm, 850 nm. The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.
LED count
The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced carries more diodes: 280 against 160. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.
Published irradiance
Only the Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced publishes an irradiance figure (26,9–50,0 mW/cm² por modo · rojo/NIR 38,4–42,6). The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) does not, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared.
Regulatory
The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced prints a searchable 510(k) number (K253712); the Shark CryoGlow (FW312) states its clearance without printing one. These devices are FDA cleared, not FDA approved — clearance is a safety and manufacturing signal, not proof of results.
Session and modes
The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced runs ~10 min per session (9 modos seleccionables). The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) runs 8 min (3 programas específicos + enfriamiento para el contorno de ojos).
Fit and power
Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced: silicona flexible, 300 g; recargable, 2000 mAh, USB-C. Shark CryoGlow (FW312): rígida, multizona; con cable USB-C (el enfriamiento necesita alimentación).

Σημειώσεις

Τι αξίζει να προσέξετε

Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced

The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced uses 280 LEDs at 465 nm, 530 nm, 630–660 nm, 850 nm, in sessions of ~10 min.

Publica nueve mediciones de irradiancia por modo y nombra el espectrorradiómetro EVERFINE HAAS-1200. Su máximo publicado es de 50,0 mW/cm². Es documentación técnica, no prueba clínica independiente.

Shark CryoGlow (FW312)

The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) uses 160+ (multizona) LEDs at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 8 min.

Dos estudios de 12 semanas realizados por la marca y divulgados públicamente — más datos publicados que la mayoría de sus rivales aquí. El enfriamiento del contorno de ojos es una función de confort, no un mecanismo lumínico.

Συχνές ερωτήσεις

Απαντήσεις στις βασικές ερωτήσεις

What is the main specification difference between the Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced and the Shark CryoGlow (FW312)?

The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced emits at 465 nm, 530 nm, 630–660 nm, 850 nm. The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.

Only the Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced publishes an irradiance figure (26,9–50,0 mW/cm² por modo · rojo/NIR 38,4–42,6). The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) does not, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared.

Which has more LEDs, the Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced or the Shark CryoGlow (FW312)?

The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced carries more diodes: 280 against 160. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.

Are the Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced and the Shark CryoGlow (FW312) FDA cleared?

Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced: Autorización de la FDA (510(k)) K253712, Clase II · CE · ISO 13485 · IEC 60601 · IEC 62471. Shark CryoGlow (FW312): Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE/UKCA. Clearance under section 510(k) means the manufacturer showed substantial equivalence to a device already on the market and met safety standards — it is not FDA approval, and it is not evidence of efficacy.