- Wavelengths
- The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced emits at 465 nm, 530 nm, 630–660 nm, 850 nm. The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.
- LED count
- The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced carries more diodes: 280 against 160. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.
- Published irradiance
- Only the Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced publishes an irradiance figure (26,9–50,0 mW/cm² por modo · rojo/NIR 38,4–42,6). The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) does not, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared.
- Regulatory
- The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced prints a searchable 510(k) number (K253712); the Shark CryoGlow (FW312) states its clearance without printing one. These devices are FDA cleared, not FDA approved — clearance is a safety and manufacturing signal, not proof of results.
- Session and modes
- The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced runs ~10 min per session (9 modos seleccionables). The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) runs 8 min (3 programas específicos + enfriamiento para el contorno de ojos).
- Fit and power
- Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced: silicona flexible, 300 g; recargable, 2000 mAh, USB-C. Shark CryoGlow (FW312): rígida, multizona; con cable USB-C (el enfriamiento necesita alimentación).