LED face masks · head to head
Two of the nine LED face masks in our comparison table, side by side. Every figure below is one the manufacturer publishes itself; where a brand stays silent the cell says so.
The short answer
The Omnilux Contour Face emits at 633 nm, 830 nm. The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.
Only the Omnilux Contour Face publishes an irradiance figure (~30 mW/cm²). The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) does not, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared.
Σύγκριση προδιαγραφών
| Specification | Omnilux Contour Face | Shark CryoGlow (FW312) |
|---|---|---|
| Μήκη κύματος | 633 nm830 nm | 415 nm630 nm830 nm |
| LED | 132 | 160+ (multizona) |
| Ακτινοβολία | ~30 mW/cm² | No publicada |
| Δόση | ~18 J/cm² | — |
| Συνεδρία | 10 min | 8 min |
| Λειτουργίες | Programa único, 3–5×/semana | 3 programas específicos + enfriamiento para el contorno de ojos |
| Κανονιστική κατάσταση | Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE · TGA (Australia) | Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE/UKCA |
| Εφαρμογή | Silicona flexible | Rígida, multizona |
| Ισχύς | Controlador recargable | Con cable USB-C (el enfriamiento necesita alimentación) |
| Τιμή | 453,75 € | 379,99 € |
“Published irradiance” means the brand prints an output figure on its own product page. “FDA cleared” is not “FDA approved” — see the questions below.
Where they differ
Σημειώσεις
The Omnilux Contour Face uses 132 LEDs at 633 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 10 min.
La plataforma LED de Omnilux se cita en más de 40 estudios revisados por pares a lo largo de más de 20 años — el mayor historial clínico de la categoría, aunque los datos específicos de la máscara de consumo siguen procediendo de la marca.
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) uses 160+ (multizona) LEDs at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 8 min.
Dos estudios de 12 semanas realizados por la marca y divulgados públicamente — más datos publicados que la mayoría de sus rivales aquí. El enfriamiento del contorno de ojos es una función de confort, no un mecanismo lumínico.
Συχνές ερωτήσεις
The Omnilux Contour Face emits at 633 nm, 830 nm. The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.
Only the Omnilux Contour Face publishes an irradiance figure (~30 mW/cm²). The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) does not, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared.
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) carries more diodes: 160 against 132. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.
Omnilux Contour Face: Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE · TGA (Australia). Shark CryoGlow (FW312): Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE/UKCA. Clearance under section 510(k) means the manufacturer showed substantial equivalence to a device already on the market and met safety standards — it is not FDA approval, and it is not evidence of efficacy.
Keep comparing