LED face masks · head to head
Two of the nine LED face masks in our comparison table, side by side. Every figure below is one the manufacturer publishes itself; where a brand stays silent the cell says so.
The short answer
The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 emits at 463 nm, 592 nm, 633 nm. The The Light Salon Boost Advanced emits at 633 nm, 830 nm. The The Light Salon Boost Advanced covers both red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin; the Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 does not.
Only the The Light Salon Boost Advanced publishes an irradiance figure (~30 mW/cm² · ~18 J/cm² por sesión). The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 does not, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared.
Σύγκριση προδιαγραφών
| Specification | Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 | The Light Salon Boost Advanced |
|---|---|---|
| Μήκη κύματος | 463 nm592 nm633 nm | 633 nm830 nm |
| LED | 100 | 112 (56 × 633 nm · 56 × 830 nm) |
| Ακτινοβολία | No publicada | ~30 mW/cm² · ~18 J/cm² por sesión |
| Δόση | — | ~18 J/cm² |
| Συνεδρία | ~10 min | 10 min |
| Λειτουργίες | 4 colores | Programa único, 3–5×/semana |
| Κανονιστική κατάσταση | Dispositivo cosmético con marcado CE — sin autorización de la FDA para este modelo | Autorización de la FDA (510(k)) K191629 · CE |
| Εφαρμογή | Semirrígida | Silicona flexible |
| Ισχύς | Recargable, ~130 min de autonomía | Batería recargable |
| Τιμή | 160,00 € | 450,00 € |
“Published irradiance” means the brand prints an output figure on its own product page. “FDA cleared” is not “FDA approved” — see the questions below.
Where they differ
Σημειώσεις
The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 uses 100 LEDs at 463 nm, 592 nm, 633 nm, in sessions of ~10 min.
Un dispositivo cosmético, no un producto médico certificado. Sus 463 nm y 592 nm cuentan con menos respaldo de evidencia que el rojo y el infrarrojo cercano principales.
The The Light Salon Boost Advanced uses 112 (56 × 633 nm · 56 × 830 nm) LEDs at 633 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 10 min.
Publica tanto una dosis por sesión como un número de autorización de la FDA verificable — una transparencia poco habitual para una marca de consumo.
Συχνές ερωτήσεις
The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 emits at 463 nm, 592 nm, 633 nm. The The Light Salon Boost Advanced emits at 633 nm, 830 nm. The The Light Salon Boost Advanced covers both red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin; the Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 does not.
Only the The Light Salon Boost Advanced publishes an irradiance figure (~30 mW/cm² · ~18 J/cm² por sesión). The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 does not, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared.
The The Light Salon Boost Advanced carries more diodes: 112 against 100. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.
Silk’n LED Face Mask 100: Dispositivo cosmético con marcado CE — sin autorización de la FDA para este modelo. The Light Salon Boost Advanced: Autorización de la FDA (510(k)) K191629 · CE. Clearance under section 510(k) means the manufacturer showed substantial equivalence to a device already on the market and met safety standards — it is not FDA approval, and it is not evidence of efficacy.
Keep comparing