LED face masks · head to head
Two of the nine LED face masks in our comparison table, side by side. Every figure below is one the manufacturer publishes itself; where a brand stays silent the cell says so.
The short answer
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. The The Light Salon Boost Advanced emits at 633 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.
Only the The Light Salon Boost Advanced publishes an irradiance figure (~30 mW/cm² · ~18 J/cm² por sesión). The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) does not, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared.
Σύγκριση προδιαγραφών
| Specification | Shark CryoGlow (FW312) | The Light Salon Boost Advanced |
|---|---|---|
| Μήκη κύματος | 415 nm630 nm830 nm | 633 nm830 nm |
| LED | 160+ (multizona) | 112 (56 × 633 nm · 56 × 830 nm) |
| Ακτινοβολία | No publicada | ~30 mW/cm² · ~18 J/cm² por sesión |
| Δόση | — | ~18 J/cm² |
| Συνεδρία | 8 min | 10 min |
| Λειτουργίες | 3 programas específicos + enfriamiento para el contorno de ojos | Programa único, 3–5×/semana |
| Κανονιστική κατάσταση | Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE/UKCA | Autorización de la FDA (510(k)) K191629 · CE |
| Εφαρμογή | Rígida, multizona | Silicona flexible |
| Ισχύς | Con cable USB-C (el enfriamiento necesita alimentación) | Batería recargable |
| Τιμή | 379,99 € | 450,00 € |
“Published irradiance” means the brand prints an output figure on its own product page. “FDA cleared” is not “FDA approved” — see the questions below.
Where they differ
Σημειώσεις
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) uses 160+ (multizona) LEDs at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 8 min.
Dos estudios de 12 semanas realizados por la marca y divulgados públicamente — más datos publicados que la mayoría de sus rivales aquí. El enfriamiento del contorno de ojos es una función de confort, no un mecanismo lumínico.
The The Light Salon Boost Advanced uses 112 (56 × 633 nm · 56 × 830 nm) LEDs at 633 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 10 min.
Publica tanto una dosis por sesión como un número de autorización de la FDA verificable — una transparencia poco habitual para una marca de consumo.
Συχνές ερωτήσεις
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. The The Light Salon Boost Advanced emits at 633 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.
Only the The Light Salon Boost Advanced publishes an irradiance figure (~30 mW/cm² · ~18 J/cm² por sesión). The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) does not, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared.
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) carries more diodes: 160 against 112. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.
Shark CryoGlow (FW312): Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE/UKCA. The Light Salon Boost Advanced: Autorización de la FDA (510(k)) K191629 · CE. Clearance under section 510(k) means the manufacturer showed substantial equivalence to a device already on the market and met safety standards — it is not FDA approval, and it is not evidence of efficacy.
Keep comparing