LED face masks · head to head
Two of the nine LED face masks in our comparison table, side by side. Every figure below is one the manufacturer publishes itself; where a brand stays silent the cell says so.
The short answer
The Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask emits at 640 nm, 850 nm. The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.
Neither brand publishes an irradiance figure, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared from the specification sheets.
Σύγκριση προδιαγραφών
| Specification | Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask | Shark CryoGlow (FW312) |
|---|---|---|
| Μήκη κύματος | 640 nm850 nm | 415 nm630 nm830 nm |
| LED | 432 | 160+ (multizona) |
| Ακτινοβολία | No publicada | No publicada |
| Δόση | — | — |
| Συνεδρία | 10–20 min | 8 min |
| Λειτουργίες | 7 modos | 3 programas específicos + enfriamiento para el contorno de ojos |
| Κανονιστική κατάσταση | Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE | Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE/UKCA |
| Εφαρμογή | Flexible | Rígida, multizona |
| Ισχύς | Recargable | Con cable USB-C (el enfriamiento necesita alimentación) |
| Τιμή | 149,99 € | 379,99 € |
“Published irradiance” means the brand prints an output figure on its own product page. “FDA cleared” is not “FDA approved” — see the questions below.
Where they differ
Σημειώσεις
The Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask uses 432 LEDs at 640 nm, 850 nm, in sessions of 10–20 min.
Cuenta con autorización de la FDA y el segundo mayor número de diodos de esta tabla, pero 640/850 nm se sitúan ligeramente fuera de los picos más estudiados (633/830 nm), y el acabado resulta menos sólido que el de las máscaras de silicona.
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) uses 160+ (multizona) LEDs at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 8 min.
Dos estudios de 12 semanas realizados por la marca y divulgados públicamente — más datos publicados que la mayoría de sus rivales aquí. El enfriamiento del contorno de ojos es una función de confort, no un mecanismo lumínico.
Συχνές ερωτήσεις
The Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask emits at 640 nm, 850 nm. The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) emits at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.
Neither brand publishes an irradiance figure, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared from the specification sheets.
The Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask carries more diodes: 432 against 160. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.
Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask: Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE. Shark CryoGlow (FW312): Autorización de la FDA (FDA clearance) · CE/UKCA. Clearance under section 510(k) means the manufacturer showed substantial equivalence to a device already on the market and met safety standards — it is not FDA approval, and it is not evidence of efficacy.
Keep comparing