LED face masks · head to head
Two of the nine LED face masks in our comparison table, side by side. Every figure below is one the manufacturer publishes itself; where a brand stays silent the cell says so.
The short answer
The Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask emits at 640 nm, 850 nm. The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 emits at 463 nm, 592 nm, 633 nm. The Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask covers both red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin; the Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 does not.
Neither brand publishes an irradiance figure, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared from the specification sheets.
Side by side
| Specification | Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask | Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 |
|---|---|---|
| Wavelengths | 640 nm850 nm | 463 nm592 nm633 nm |
| LEDs | 432 | 100 |
| Published irradiance | Not published | Not published |
| Dose per session | — | — |
| Session | 10–20 min | ~10 min |
| Modes | 7 modes | 4 colours |
| Regulatory | FDA cleared · CE | CE marked cosmetic device — no FDA clearance for this model |
| Fit | Flexible | Semi-rigid |
| Power | Rechargeable | Rechargeable, ~130 min runtime |
| Price (EU) | €149.99 €0.35 per LED | €160.00 €1.60 per LED |
“Published irradiance” means the brand prints an output figure on its own product page. “FDA cleared” is not “FDA approved” — see the questions below.
Where they differ
Evidence notes
The Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask uses 432 LEDs at 640 nm, 850 nm, in sessions of 10–20 min.
FDA cleared with the second-highest diode count here, but 640/850 nm sit slightly off the most-studied 633/830 nm peaks, and the build is less substantial than the silicone masks.
The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 uses 100 LEDs at 463 nm, 592 nm, 633 nm, in sessions of ~10 min.
A cosmetic device rather than a certified medical one. Its 463 nm and 592 nm are less evidence-backed than the core red and near-infrared.
Questions
The Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask emits at 640 nm, 850 nm. The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 emits at 463 nm, 592 nm, 633 nm. The Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask covers both red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin; the Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 does not.
Neither brand publishes an irradiance figure, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared from the specification sheets.
The Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask carries more diodes: 432 against 100. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.
Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask: FDA cleared · CE. Silk’n LED Face Mask 100: CE marked cosmetic device — no FDA clearance for this model. Clearance under section 510(k) means the manufacturer showed substantial equivalence to a device already on the market and met safety standards — it is not FDA approval, and it is not evidence of efficacy.
Keep comparing