- Wavelengths
- The The Light Salon Boost Advanced emits at 633 nm, 830 nm. The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo emits at 415 nm, 633 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.
- LED count
- The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo carries more diodes: 504 against 112. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.
- Published irradiance
- Only the The Light Salon Boost Advanced publishes an irradiance figure (~30 mW/cm² · ~18 J/cm² per session). The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo does not, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared.
- Regulatory
- The The Light Salon Boost Advanced prints a searchable 510(k) number (K191629); the Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo states its clearance without printing one. These devices are FDA cleared, not FDA approved — clearance is a safety and manufacturing signal, not proof of results.
- Session and modes
- The The Light Salon Boost Advanced runs 10 min per session (single programme, 3–5×/week). The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo runs 12 min (3 wavelengths + vibration).
- Fit and power
- The Light Salon Boost Advanced: flexible silicone; rechargeable battery pack. Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo: semi-rigid, cordless; cordless rechargeable.