Side by side
5 of the 9 masks in this comparison have a European list price under €400: Nanoleaf (€149.99), Silk’n (€160.00), Dr. Renú (€279.00), Therabody (€349.00) and Shark (€379.99). Every price comes from the manufacturer’s own European storefront, checked 2026. List prices only — sale prices change weekly and are ignored here.
Side by side
| Brand & model | Wavelengths | LEDs | Published irradiance | Dose per session | Session | Regulatory | Fit & power | Price (EU) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced | 465 nm530 nm630–660 nm850 nm | 280 | 26.9–50.0 mW/cm² by mode · red/NIR 38.4–42.6 | up to 30 J/cm² | ~10 min 9 selectable modes |
FDA 510(k) K253712, Class II · CE · ISO 13485 · IEC 60601 · IEC 62471 | Flexible silicone, 300 g Rechargeable 2000 mAh USB-C |
€279.00 |
| Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask | 640 nm850 nm | 432 | Not published | — | 10–20 min 7 modes |
FDA cleared · CE | Flexible Rechargeable |
€149.99 |
| Shark CryoGlow (FW312) | 415 nm630 nm830 nm | 160+ (multi-zone) | Not published | — | 8 min 3 targeted programmes + under-eye cooling |
FDA cleared · CE/UKCA | Rigid, multi-zone Corded USB-C (cooling needs power) |
€379.99 |
| Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 | 463 nm592 nm633 nm | 100 | Not published | — | ~10 min 4 colours |
CE marked cosmetic device — no FDA clearance for this model | Semi-rigid Rechargeable, ~130 min runtime |
€160.00 |
| Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo | 415 nm633 nm830 nm | 504 | Not published | — | 12 min 3 wavelengths + vibration |
FDA cleared · CE | Semi-rigid, cordless Cordless rechargeable |
€349.00 |
EU list prices checked 2026 on each maker’s own European storefront. List price only — sale prices are ignored, because they change weekly. Dose is irradiance × session length; it can only be calculated for the four makers that publish irradiance.
Evidence notes
The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced uses 280 LEDs at 465 nm, 530 nm, 630–660 nm, 850 nm, in sessions of ~10 min.
Publishes nine mode-level irradiance measurements and names the EVERFINE HAAS-1200 spectroradiometer. Its published maximum is 50.0 mW/cm². This is technical documentation, not independent clinical proof.
The Nanoleaf LED Light Therapy Face Mask uses 432 LEDs at 640 nm, 850 nm, in sessions of 10–20 min.
FDA cleared with the second-highest diode count here, but 640/850 nm sit slightly off the most-studied 633/830 nm peaks, and the build is less substantial than the silicone masks.
The Shark CryoGlow (FW312) uses 160+ (multi-zone) LEDs at 415 nm, 630 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 8 min.
Two disclosed brand-run 12-week studies — more published data than most rivals here. The under-eye cooling is a comfort feature, not a light mechanism.
The Silk’n LED Face Mask 100 uses 100 LEDs at 463 nm, 592 nm, 633 nm, in sessions of ~10 min.
A cosmetic device rather than a certified medical one. Its 463 nm and 592 nm are less evidence-backed than the core red and near-infrared.
The Therabody TheraFace Mask Glo uses 504 LEDs at 415 nm, 633 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 12 min.
Cites a 104-subject study, the largest the brand claims in the category — brand-run. The vibration is a comfort extra, not a skin mechanism.
Keep comparing