LED face masks · head to head

Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced vs
Omnilux Contour Face

Two of the nine LED face masks in our comparison table, side by side. Every figure below is one the manufacturer publishes itself; where a brand stays silent the cell says so.

Side by side

The specifications

Manufacturer-published specifications, checked 19 August 2026.
Specification Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced Omnilux Contour Face
Wavelengths465 nm530 nm630–660 nm850 nm633 nm830 nm
LED count280132
Published irradianceUp to 50 mW/cm²Not published
Session~10 min10 min
Modes9 selectable modesSingle programme, 3–5×/week
RegulatoryFDA 510(k) K253712, Class II · CE · ISO 13485 · IEC 60601 · IEC 62471FDA cleared · CE · TGA (Australia)
FitFlexible silicone, 300 gFlexible silicone
PowerRechargeable 2000 mAh USB-CRechargeable controller

“Published irradiance” means the brand prints an output figure on its own product page. “FDA cleared” is not “FDA approved” — see the questions below.

Where they differ

Wavelengths
The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced emits at 465 nm, 530 nm, 630–660 nm, 850 nm. The Omnilux Contour Face emits at 633 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.
LED count
The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced carries more diodes: 280 against 132. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.
Published irradiance
Only the Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced publishes an irradiance figure (up to 50 mW/cm²). The Omnilux Contour Face does not, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared.
Regulatory
The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced prints a searchable 510(k) number (K253712); the Omnilux Contour Face states its clearance without printing one. These devices are FDA cleared, not FDA approved — clearance is a safety and manufacturing signal, not proof of results.
Session and modes
The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced runs ~10 min per session (9 selectable modes). The Omnilux Contour Face runs 10 min (single programme, 3–5×/week).
Fit and power
Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced: flexible silicone, 300 g; rechargeable 2000 mAh USB-C. Omnilux Contour Face: flexible silicone; rechargeable controller.

Evidence notes

What the specifications don’t tell you

Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced

The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced uses 280 LEDs at 465 nm, 530 nm, 630–660 nm, 850 nm, in sessions of ~10 min.

Publishes an irradiance figure and states spectrometer testing. Its own efficacy testing is brand-run. The 465 nm blue and 530 nm green are less evidenced than the red and near-infrared.

Omnilux Contour Face

The Omnilux Contour Face uses 132 LEDs at 633 nm, 830 nm, in sessions of 10 min.

The Omnilux LED platform is referenced across 40+ peer-reviewed papers over 20+ years — the deepest clinical heritage in the category, though consumer-mask-specific data is still brand-linked.

Questions

Common questions

What is the main specification difference between the Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced and the Omnilux Contour Face?

The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced emits at 465 nm, 530 nm, 630–660 nm, 850 nm. The Omnilux Contour Face emits at 633 nm, 830 nm. Both cover red and near-infrared, the two ranges with the strongest published evidence for skin.

Only the Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced publishes an irradiance figure (up to 50 mW/cm²). The Omnilux Contour Face does not, so the dose the two masks deliver cannot be compared.

Which has more LEDs, the Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced or the Omnilux Contour Face?

The Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced carries more diodes: 280 against 132. Diode count sets how evenly light reaches the face — a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.

Are the Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced and the Omnilux Contour Face FDA cleared?

Dr. Renú SpectraLift™ Advanced: FDA 510(k) K253712, Class II · CE · ISO 13485 · IEC 60601 · IEC 62471. Omnilux Contour Face: FDA cleared · CE · TGA (Australia). Clearance under section 510(k) means the manufacturer showed substantial equivalence to a device already on the market and met safety standards — it is not FDA approval, and it is not evidence of efficacy.