LED face masks · head to head

Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap vs
CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet

Two of the nine hair-growth devices in our full comparison, isolated so the meaningful differences are easier to see. Every figure comes from a manufacturer source.

The short answer

Dr. Renú is the only device of these two to use 850 nm near-infrared and to publish output per cm². CurrentBody uses 120 LEDs (no lasers); its published output is Not published. That is a specification difference, not proof of better regrowth from either device.

Side by side

The specifications

Manufacturer-published specifications, checked 20 August 2026.
Specification	Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap	CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet
Light source	192 LED cores in 96 dual-chip modules (no lasers)	120 LEDs (no lasers)
Wavelengths	660 nm850 nm	620–660 nm
Published output	30–45 mW/cm² (20–30 at 660 nm + 10–15 at 850 nm)	Not published
Session	10 min, daily	10 min, daily
Modes	Continuous, 10 Hz or 40 Hz pulse · 5 intensity levels	Single programme · built-in Bluetooth headphones
Regulatory	No device-specific FDA clearance published	FDA cleared (stated; no number printed)
Fit & power	Soft fabric cap Rechargeable 2000 mAh USB-C, cordless	Rigid helmet USB-rechargeable, cordless

“Published output” means a figure printed on the brand’s own product page or manual. A total milliwatt figure cannot be converted into a dose without the treated area — only an output per cm² can. “FDA cleared” is not “FDA approved” — see the FAQ.

Where they differ

Light source: Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap: 192 LED cores in 96 dual-chip modules (no lasers). CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet: 120 LEDs (no lasers).
Wavelengths: Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap: 660 nm, 850 nm. CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet: 620–660 nm.
Published output: Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap: 30–45 mW/cm² (20–30 at 660 nm + 10–15 at 850 nm). CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet: Not published.
Session: Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap: 10 min, daily. CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet: 10 min, daily.
Regulatory: Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap: No device-specific FDA clearance published. CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet: FDA cleared (stated; no number printed).
Fit & power: Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap: Soft fabric cap; Rechargeable 2000 mAh USB-C, cordless. CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet: Rigid helmet; USB-rechargeable, cordless.

Evidence notes

What the specifications don’t tell you

Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap

The Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap uses 192 LED cores in 96 dual-chip modules (no lasers) at 660 nm, 850 nm, in sessions of 10 min, daily.

The only device in the table to publish irradiance per cm² — the figure a dose calculation actually needs — and the only one to add near-infrared at 850 nm, which has thinner hair-specific evidence than red. The counterweight: its efficacy figures come from third-party LLLT literature rather than a trial of this device, and it publishes no device-specific FDA clearance, which every US laser cap here claims.

CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet

The CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet uses 120 LEDs (no lasers) at 620–660 nm, in sessions of 10 min, daily.

Cites an 84-day, 31-subject study run by the testing lab Intertek — unusually for the category, the lab is named. Red light only, described as a 620–660 nm range rather than a single peak, and no output figure. The built-in Bluetooth headphones are a comfort feature, not a light mechanism.

Questions

Common questions

What is the main difference between Dr. Renú and CurrentBody?

Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap: 192 LED cores in 96 dual-chip modules (no lasers). CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet: 120 LEDs (no lasers).

Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap: 660 nm, 850 nm. CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet: 620–660 nm.

Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap: 30–45 mW/cm² (20–30 at 660 nm + 10–15 at 850 nm). CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet: Not published.

Does the higher diode count mean better hair growth?

Not on its own. Diode counts here run from 80 (Theradome) to 282 (iRestore Professional), and four devices share exactly 272. Count mainly determines how evenly light reaches the scalp; the dose is output per area multiplied by session time — and Theradome, with the lowest count, publishes more regulatory paperwork than any 272-diode cap.

Treat diode count the way the mask table treats LED count: a coverage figure, not an efficacy figure.

Which has stronger regulatory documentation?

Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap: No device-specific FDA clearance published. CurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet: FDA cleared (stated; no number printed).

Eight of the nine claim FDA clearance, but only 2 print a searchable 510(k) number anywhere on their own site: illumiflow (K162071) and Theradome (K171775, K122950 and K113097). The Dr. Renú cap publishes no device-specific clearance at all — the only device here that does not claim one.

As on the face-mask side: these devices are FDA cleared, not FDA approved. Clearance means substantial equivalence to a device already on the market plus safety testing — a manufacturing and safety signal, not proof the device will regrow your hair.

Keep comparing

Compare Dr. Renú with every hair device

Hair growth cap and helmet comparison Dr. Renú vs Capillus CapillusPro Dr. Renú vs HairMax PowerFlex Laser Cap 272 Dr. Renú vs illumiflow 272 Pro Laser Cap Dr. Renú vs iRestore Essential Dr. Renú vs iRestore Professional Dr. Renú vs Kiierr 272 Premier Laser Cap Dr. Renú vs Theradome PRO LH80

Dr. Renú LED Anti Hair Loss Cap vsCurrentBody Skin LED Hair Growth Helmet